|
|
Articles of interest
We have to do more!
Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is warning both employers and drivers
about the consequences of not taking reasonable care for the safety
of others after a council employee was killed.
Dudley Metropolitan Council was fined £30,000 and ordered to pay £20,000
in costs after pleading guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health
and Safety at Work Act.
Michael Lilley, a council employee and the driver of the vehicle, pleaded
guilty to two breaches of Section 7 of the Health and Safety at Work
Act and was fined £750 and ordered to pay £500 in costs.
The man killed was George Pagett, a council employee who was described
as a well-liked professional manager. He was struck and killed by a wheeled
shovel loader, driven by Mr Lilley, in Dudley MBC's Lister Road Depot
in Netherton on 27 October 2006. Wolverhampton Court, sitting at the
Waterfront, Brierley Hill, heard how Mr Lilley drove against the direction
of the site's one-way system and had the loading shovel at a height that
meant he couldn't see in front properly. He also didn't take suitable
precautions to make sure he didn't damage any other vehicles or harm
pedestrians.
Mr Pagett had been wearing a high visibility jacket and was facing the
oncoming traffic in the yard when he was hit in the upper back by the
blade of the wheeled loader shovel's bucket. Other employees tried to
warn Mr Pagett and divert Mr Lilley, but the vehicle did not stop until
after the front wheel had run him over.
HSE inspector David Price said:
"
This was a terrible incident that could so easily have been prevented.
Mr Pagett's untimely death has brought great grief to his family, and
to many of his work colleagues.
"
Depots and loading yards are potentially dangerous places, with vehicles
often required to manoeuvre in tight or enclosed spaces. Employers need
to provide set routes, to keep pedestrians and vehicles safely apart.
They also need to check their site rules and systems of work are both
appropriate and adequately enforced.
"
Drivers need to obey signs and instructions in workplaces, just as closely
as they would obey them on a public highway. In driving at over 8mph
against the one-way system, with the unnecessarily raised bucket obscuring
much of his view through the windscreen, Michael Lilley failed to take
reasonable care for the health and safety of Mr Pagett."
Safety Tips.
While vehicle manufacturers can make improvements to vehicles and incorporate
the latest safety technologies the most crucial influence on road safety
is driver behaviour. It is not just the obvious and often repeated tips
on visibility and warnings to car drivers to be aware of the difficulties
faced by truckers. These include lane changing, braking distances, headlamp
dipping and indicating. Other factors which help to improve traffic safety
include;
•
Drive actively, in other words, be aware of traffic risks, plan your
driving and pay continuous attention to other road users.
•
Always wear your seat belt
•
Stop for a rest at regular intervals and do a few relaxing exercises.
•
Be sure to get a proper sleep every 24 hours. A well rested driver is
a better and more active one.
•
Drive efficiently and save fuel. Brake as little as possible to minimise
brake wear.
•
A well maintained truck is a safer truck. Just like it’s driver.
•
Be kind to your body, avoid fatty foods and soft drinks
Tired?
Driver tiredness is the biggest killer on our roads, particularly on
motorways and other monotonous roads. One in five crashes on these roads
is estimated to have been caused by drivers nodding off at the wheel
and the ratio of serious injuries is even higher because a sleeping driver
doesn’t brake before an accident. Driving at night or during the
afternoon dip are the most dangerous times.
Some of the things people do when they are feeling tired whilst driving
are opening a window, turning up the volume of the radio or just trying
to fight sleep off. They don’t prevent sleep, especially the “microsleeps” of
just a few seconds.
The Government’s recommendations if you feel tired while driving
are:
• Drink two cups of coffee or, ideally, a high-caffeine drink.
• Take a ten minute snooze to give the caffeine time to kick in.
•
If you are still tired don’t drive any further.
The advice adds that the effect of the caffeine only last 60 – 90
minutes and the only real solution is not to be tired in the first place.
Some of the things that can be done are:
•
Get enough sleep – Obvious enough but it is impossible to stop
yourself eventually falling asleep if you are shattered.
• Let people know if you are having trouble sleeping and take it into account
when planning journeys.
•
Make sure that any medication you take doesn’t cause drowsiness.
• Drive carefully and calmly and think about any possible hazards (like
the nutter who is swapping lanes and cutting up cars in front of you
to get wherever they are going a minute quicker, if they are lucky).
It helps prevent boredom if nothing else.
• Be especially alert on long monotonous roads. Cruise control is a nice
technological advance but can make it even easier to fall asleep.
• Be especially careful and if possible avoid driving at the most dangerous
times, between midnight and 6am and 2pm to 4pm.
Romania - A Romanian
train driver is facing disciplinary action after he stopped his train
to get out for a cigarette. He stopped in the middle of the countryside
and he also allowed passengers to get off the train.
Smoking was recently banned on trains in Romania, reports the Evenimentul
Zilei newspaper.
The incident happened on the Blue Arrow, supposedly the country's fastest
and most modern train
The train had just passed the city of Timisoara when the driver announced: "Passengers
may get off now, we'll take a five minutes cigarette break."
One of the passengers, Adina-Nicoleta B, told the newspaper: "I couldn't
believe my ears when I heard the announcement about the cigarette break.
" We were not traveling by bus. It was supposed to be a fast train but it
stopped in the middle of nowhere and people led by the driver went out
to have a smoke."
Railway officials said the engine driver admitted making the stop but claimed
there were technical reasons for it. However, they admitted the driver
should not have let passengers off the train and he faces disciplinary
action.
Driving to or for work in bad weather
New health and safety research has suggested that employees may
be putting themselves at risk by driving in
adverse weather conditions. Employers are reminded that they have
a duty of care towards their staff if they operate company car
schemes to lease or hire vehicles for work and if they encourage
staff to use their own vehicles on
work-related journeys.
A survey carried out by the insurance group Royal Sun Alliance has found that nearly two thirds of employees
have driven in bad weather, because they felt obligated to do so.
The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents: RoSPA,
states that businesses must assess the risk of driving on
company business in the same way that it must carry out risk assessments
on other work activities. The employer
must address the hazards associated with driving when the risk
to road traffic is greatly increased by extremes of fog, snow
or ice. The assessment must consider ‘those who may be affected’,
the driver plus any passengers but also other road users and pedestrians. Fleet
operators already have a requirement for control measures such
as vehicle checks and regular servicing to manufacturers’ standards,
but service intervals are increasing, typically to every 18,000
miles in some
instances, which extends the time between inspections.
Casual drivers who use their own vehicles are less likely to be
as thorough as a trained mechanic and tyre pressures
and depth of tread, for instance, are critical to road safety. RoSPA
recommend a minimum tread of 3mm against the
legal limit of 1.6mm and some police forces allow for 4mm depth
on operational vehicles.
Sensible advice to all people who drive
as a condition of their work is to:
•
Ask yourself the question: “is my journey really
necessary?”
•
Take sensible clothing
•
Check that the vehicle is roadworthy before setting off.
•
Check levels of oil and windscreen wash
•
Carry out a quick visual inspection of tyres and lights
•
Clean road grime and salt off light covers front and rear
•
Plan the journey and schedule breaks every 100 miles or
at two hour intervals
•
Check the weather forecast and wear appropriate clothing, in case of a beak-down
•
Carry a torch in the vehicle and take bottled water on long journeys
•
Take a mobile phone, in case you get stranded
H2Eau?
A campaign championed by the trade union Unison, seeks to encourage
the consumption of tap water at
work, rather than the more costly and less environmentally friendly use of bottled water.
The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 require the provision of “an adequate supply of
wholesome drinking water for all persons at work in the workplace”.
The ACoP specifies that: "Water should only
be provided in refillable containers where it cannot be obtained
directly from a mains supply" and in addition
that such containers be refilled daily.
The General Secretary of Unison, Dave Prentis launching the campaign
Water@Work said that “bottled water is no
better than mains water and the effect on the environment of transporting
it around the country in
large plastic bottles is enormous”.
Mains water has the advantage that it is readily available and
is unlikely to run dry. It is a much cheaper option
than paying for the delivery and collection of plastic bottles
and there is no requirement for a manual handling risk assessment
prior to refill! Bottled water is sometimes found to be not up
to the
high standard of quality found in tap water in the UK. Certain
high-profile producers of bottled waters have, in the past, had
to recall their products, because of
suspected contamination or higher levels of minerals than are
acceptable, whereas l’eu du chateau pompe is a
safe and dependable alternative way to quench a thirst; always on tap, without costing the earth.
The Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH),
which is also supporting the campaign, alongside Unison
and Water UK, states that 33 million working days are lost annually
due to occupational ill health, at a cost to
employers of £11bn a year. The Chief executive of Water
UK, Pamela Taylor, says
that good hydration can help prevent minor health complications
that lead to lost productivity and absence from work. Drinking an adequate amount of water (about
two litres per day) also improves concentration, reduces headaches
and stops feelings of tiredness. Good
hydration is critical for our well-being.
Fire, Fire - Fired?
You might remember a few years ago the company that dismissed their staff
by text message. Bosses at Robb’s Department Store in Hexam,
deliberately set off the fire bell to clear the building of customers
and get staff together in one place. At the fire assembly point they
informed the 140 staff that the store would be closing in two weeks
time.
The store's administrators called the decision "efficient and practical".
They thought it was "the most efficient and practical method of
informing their colleagues of this business development was by using
the fire alarm". A spokesman for the company said: "It is at
the discretion of the store management how the staff are given the news.
The fire alarm was set off to clear the store of members of the public."
Not the best use of the fire alarm and not a very good way to pass on
the bad news to the employees. Although not called to the fire Northumberland
Fire and Rescue Service said they would be investigating the circumstances
of the fire alarm being used in this way.
Fine Increased on Appeal.
A recent appeal case in Scotland’s High Court, HM Advocate v Munro & Sons
(Highland) Ltd, has examined the factors to be taken into account when
determining the appropriate sentence for health and safety offences.
Munro & Sons (Highland) Ltd (“Munro”), a haulage and
disposal contractor, was involved in transporting a heavy wheeled loader
on a low loaded trailer. The loader was secured by use of a parking brake
and two securing chains. It later transpired that the parking brake had
a serious defect and that the two securing chains were of insufficient
strength. As the road began to incline, the chains broke, releasing the
loader. The loader then rolled backwards and crushed the car behind,
injuring one of its occupants and killing the other. On first instance,
the sentencing judge fixed a starting point fine of £5,000, discounted
by 25 per cent to £3,750 to reflect the early plea of guilty. HM
Advocate (the “Crown”) then appealed on the basis that the
sentence was unduly lenient, and on 28 January 2009, the appeal court
found in their favour.
The initial sentence was held to be far too low, taking inadequate account
of the nature of the offence and the need for appropriate punishment
in the public interest. There was a clear - foreseeable - risk to public
safety if the loader rolled off the trailer, so by allowing there to
be a defective handbrake and inadequate securing chains, Munro had failed
to comply with its statutory duties to members of the public under the
Health & Safety at Work Act 1974. The appeal court found that an
appropriate starting point would actually have been £40,000, discounted
by 25 per cent, and a fine of £30,000 was substituted.
|